Archive for the 'Politics' Category

Twins Stadium

Awesome, awesome, awesome!

Twins, Hennepin County have stadium deal.

Under the terms of the plan to be unveiled at a Metrodome press conference Monday, the Twins and the county would build a $360 million, 42,000-seat open-air stadium. The site is near the confluence of Interstate Hwy. 394, the end of the Hiawatha Light Rail line and the proposed Northstar commuter rail in downtown Minneapolis.

Now I REALLY want to live closer to the light rail line…

Wrong

Privatize Social Security? I can tell you who is happy about that idea: See That Line at the Ferrari Dealer?

Thanksgiving Column

I forgot to post this editorial up on Thanksgiving, but as usual Thomas Friedman wrote an excellent opinion piece for the NYTimes:

Yes, I want to get almost the entire Republican side of the House of Representatives to bend its ethics rules just for me. I want to be able to twist the arms of House Republicans to repeal a rule that automatically requires party leaders to step down if they are indicted on a felony charge – something a Texas prosecutor is considering doing to DeLay because of corruption allegations.

My favorite, since I love the H2:

If I can’t be The Man, then I at least want to be the owner of a Hummer – with American flag decals all over the back bumper, because Hummer owners are, on average, a little more patriotic than you and me.

Yes, I want to drive the mother of all gas-guzzlers that gets so little mileage you have to drive from gas station to gas station. Yes, I want to drive my Hummer and never have to think that by consuming so much oil, I am making transfer payments to the worst Arab regimes that transfer money to Islamic charities that transfer money to madrassas that teach children intolerance, antipluralism and how to hate the infidels.

Are the Democrats the Past or the Future?

Very interesting article in the Economist that I found today, entitled The Fear Myth

The author’s premise is that the Republicans didn’t beat the Democrats because of fear, but because they sold hope better.

But if they are going to extract any useful lessons from their humiliation, the Democrats need to realise that the Republicans didn’t just beat them on fear. They clobbered them on hope.

I don’t think that the author gives enough credit to the power of fear. I think that it is a very powerful motivator, and I would argue that fear is a bigger motivator than hope. But I do agree with him that the Democrats didn’t spend enough time on hope.

There was no way to compete with Cheney’s “You’re all gonna die” speeches, but there was no effort to channel the soaring optimism of Obama’s convention speech:

Tonight, we gather to affirm the greatness of our nation, not because of the height of our skyscrapers, or the power of our military, or the size of our economy. Our pride is based on a very simple premise, summed up in a declaration made over two hundred years ago, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

That is the true genius of America, a faith in the simple dreams of its people, the insistence on small miracles.

and…

In the end, that is God’s greatest gift to us, the bedrock of this nation; the belief in things not seen; the belief that there are better days ahead. I believe we can give our middle class relief and provide working families with a road to opportunity. I believe we can provide jobs to the jobless, homes to the homeless, and reclaim young people in cities across America from violence and despair. I believe that as we stand on the crossroads of history, we can make the right choices, and meet the challenges that face us. America!

Obviously, Obama wasn’t running. From the Economist article:

Arguably the only optimistic thing about the Kerry campaign was its slogan: ‚ÄúHelp is on the way‚Äù. In general, the Democrats focused on America’s intractable problems. By contrast, Mr Bush not only sounded upbeat, but also came up with solutions, of sorts.

So read the article, it’s quite good. Not that I agree with the whole thing. But there are things to ponder…

Dean and the Media

Howard Dean spoke tuesday about the role of the media and politics in this country (Yale Daily News). As he is for so many different issues, I think he is absolutely right on with his comments.

The television networks, especially Fox News, are most to blame for the increased focus in journalism on flash and entertainment, Dean said. Dean said these networks aim to entertain because “entertainment sells better than news.” The infamous “scream speech,” often blamed for Dean’s loss to Sen. John Kerry ’66 in the Democratic primaries, was partially a media fabrication because it was appealing for its entertainment value rather than its newsworthiness, Dean said.

If you’ve seen the camcorder version of the speech, you will know exactly what I’m talking about. Of course, I have it on my laptop, if anyone would like to see it…

Media Self-Censorship

You may have heard that a number of ABC stations decided not to show ‘Saving Private Ryan’ on Veterans’ Day this year. Frank Rich of the NYT has written an excellent article dealing with these issues of censorship, the Iraq war, sanitizing the world for the Americans who can’t handle the truth. (You can’t handle the truth!)

What makes the “Ryan” case both chilling and a harbinger of what’s to come is that it isn’t about Janet Jackson and sex but about the presentation of war at a time when we are fighting one. That some of the companies whose stations refused to broadcast “Saving Private Ryan” also own major American newspapers in cities as various as Providence and Atlanta leaves you wondering what other kind of self-censorship will be practiced next. If these media outlets are afraid to show a graphic Hollywood treatment of a 60-year-old war starring the beloved Tom Hanks because the feds might fine them, toy with their licenses or deny them permission to expand their empires, might they defensively soften their news divisions’ efforts to present the graphic truth of an ongoing war? The pressure groups that are exercised by Bono and “Saving Private Ryan” are often the same ones who are campaigning to derail any news organization that’s not towing the administration line in lockstep with Fox.

Even without being threatened, American news media at first sanitized the current war, whether through carelessness or jingoism, proving too credulous about everything from weapons of mass destruction to “Saving Private Lynch” to “Mission Accomplished.” During the early weeks of the invasion, carnage of any kind was kept off TV screens, as if war could be cost-free. Once the press did get its act together and exercised skepticism, it came under siege. News organizations that report facts challenging the administration’s version of events risk being called traitors. As with “Saving Private Ryan,” the aim of the news censors is to bleach out any ugliness or violence. But because the war in Iraq, unlike World War II, is increasingly unpopular and doesn’t have an assured triumphant ending, it must also be scrubbed of any bad news that might undermine its support among the administration’s base. Thus the censors argue that Abu Ghraib, and now a marine’s shooting of a wounded Iraqi prisoner in a Falluja mosque, are vastly “overplayed” by the so-called elite media.

I think it’s become very clear in the last year that there is fundamental disconnect about what people in this country “believe” is happening in the world around us. It is this disconnect of “faith-based” vs. “reality-based” that has created a climate where people will vote for a president who, in my opinion, has recklessly gotten us into a war, and then they don’t want to see the results of it.

Or don’t want to be reminded of the results of past wars. I’m pretty sure Saving Private Ryan was universally praised for it’s accurate depiction of War. Well, we’ve got one going on right now. It’s always your right to tune out, but let’s not block people who want the truth from actually getting the truth.

Fallujah In Pictures

Mandate? Pffft!

Okay,

Something we’ve all been hearing about is the broad victory by president bush! A clear mandate! Most votes ever!

Hogwash! I say.

Okay, the last one is true, he did get the most votes ever in a presidential election.

Do you know who got the second most votes in american history? John Kerry.

It was the closest win for an incumbent president since woodrow wilson.

So when you hear people talking about this as if there was a massive landslide victory, be sure to get up and deliver a verbal smackdown to the tune of: “51% is hardly a mandate!”

Nearly half of us don’t agree with:

  • Lying to the American people about the reasons for going to Iraq.
  • Destroying the environment in the name of oil and gas exploration.
  • Recklessly cutting taxes while we are in the depths of an enormous debt.

I could go on, there are many more reasons, but it is clear that many people don’t care about these things, and don’t care what I have to say about it.

But, thanks for passing the buck to my unborn children! That’ll be really fun for them.

« Previous PageNext Page »